

- #Canoscan software for mac install
- #Canoscan software for mac drivers
- #Canoscan software for mac driver
- #Canoscan software for mac code
A combination of unlucky circumstances made it do the exact opposite on this customer’s machine and that’s unfortunate. the MyPrettyAccountingPackage’s of the world), this redirection will make them work perfectly fine without requiring admin rights on the box.
#Canoscan software for mac driver
Probably at the point of installation, Vista did not know that this was a printer driver in particular that was installing and not some other piece of software. Of course I know that both solutions have their advantages and disadvantages, but… a capable and standard conforming scanner, a PS or PCL compatible laser printer, a separate faxing machine… you surely get my idea. Corporate customers seem to prefer single devices for each job, e. Such devices are usually sold to home users. This seems to be very popular in multifunctional printers (“electrical sheet feeders”), egg-laying wool milk sows that do printing, copying, scanning, faxing, peeping et cetera.
#Canoscan software for mac drivers
If I may add this: Problems like the one described seem to occur only on nonstandard hardware, meaning that the manufacturer does not try to build a device compliant to existing standards and better insisting on doing everything in a different, incompatible way, forcing different drivers for different OSes.
#Canoscan software for mac install
Another option would be to detect the hardware, automatically download the proper driver (if it isn’t there already), install it, and the work is done. They should prohibit installing wrong drivers, or, mich better, they should include the drivers and load them automatically if the related hardware is detected (this is how UNIX and Linux usually handle hardware, in most cases), there should not be a need to do something manually. Modern operating systems, to come back on topic, should deal with such “lazy” users. They are driving a car when they are drunk and / or on drugs, they cause an accident, and they do complain why the car manufacturer didn’t protect them or why the tree didn’t get out of their way.

The situation, as you described, is a typical one: People are doing stupid things and start complaining. They want to do things without needing to know anything. Sorry, but users don’t learn, they are not interested in learning. If he wasn’t able or interested to learn a little more about his computer he should at least have asked someone to help him instead of wrecking his install and then making a media circus out of it.
#Canoscan software for mac code
Exiting.” This isn’t very helpful except you have the vendor’s error code listing. But error messages provided don’t help them fixing the problem on their own: “Error installing driver. On the other hand, there are users who want to know which problem occured, most exactly and quickly.

Tech Support: “May I ask what operating system you are running today?” Why? Because users don’t use an OS, they even don’t use a particular program (except it is their favourite pirated software) – they simply do things, and some of them even don’t remember what they’ve done a few seconds after messing up a system. “I don’t need no stinkin traffic lights, I see a free road by myself!” 🙂īut honestly, in reality your requirement would save much time and stop most of the usual problems from occuring.

Furthermore, don’t bother him with traffic rules. Clearly, someone like that has no business installing drivers.īecause people like car analogies, here’s one: You cannot expect a car driver to know what kind of car he’s driving. It’s one of the most basic things to know about your computer. But I have to disagree about the part where the average user shouldn’t know what OS is running.
